Einige Punkte gilt es zu beachten Brazilian Studio
顯示包含「《歷久彌新-崇拜與教會更新》」標籤的文章。顯示所有文章
顯示包含「《歷久彌新-崇拜與教會更新》」標籤的文章。顯示所有文章

2025年9月11日星期四

在黑暗中尋光:基督徒如何面對萬聖節?

在黑暗中尋光:基督徒如何面對萬聖節?



一、節日是文化的窗口

街道掛起橙黑色彩旗、超市堆滿糖果與南瓜,小孩們期待穿上造型服飾──萬聖節到了。

對許多家庭來說,這是一個充滿歡笑與創意的節日,但對不少基督徒而言,萬聖節卻總帶著一絲不安。我們該參與嗎?該完全拒絕嗎?是否有第三條路?

要理解萬聖節,先要理解它的根源與演變。


二、從亡靈節到派對之夜

萬聖節(Halloween)的起源可追溯至古代凱爾特人為迎接冬季而設的薩溫節(Samhain)¹,當時人們相信10月31日是亡靈回歸人間的日子,點燃篝火、扮裝驅邪,成為當時重要的儀式。

公元七世紀,教會為回應當地文化,將11月1日訂為「諸聖節」(All Saints' Day),紀念歷代聖徒,前一晚被稱為「萬聖前夕」(All Hallows' Eve),即今日的Halloween。這是文化轉化的一次實驗,試圖將對死亡與靈界的恐懼,轉為對信仰與復活的盼望²。

然而,隨著時間流轉,萬聖節逐漸世俗化,失去其原初的宗教意涵。在北美,它成為一場全民參與的「變裝嘉年華」,從墓園與骷髏到蜘蛛與女巫,從家庭裝飾到校園活動,萬聖節形成一種「以恐懼為樂、以死亡為趣」的節慶文化。


三、文化現象的鏡子:我們在慶祝什麼?

萬聖節的普及,也是一面照出當代文化心態的鏡子:

•            對死亡的戲化:現代社會習慣用輕鬆、幽默甚至惡搞的方式處理死亡,逃避其真實的重量,也模糊了生死議題的嚴肅性。

•            對恐懼的美化:節日中大量使用驚嚇、血腥與恐怖元素,將原本令人避之不及的事物包裝為娛樂與樂趣。

•            對信仰的去中心化:節日的宗教根源早被遺忘,信仰成為可有可無的裝飾,甚至被妖魔化所取代。

這些現象不只是萬聖節的問題,更是整體文化脈絡中的一種反映──當失去了永恆的視角,人們只能在短暫中尋求刺激;當對死亡沒有答案,只好將恐懼轉為笑話。


四、聖經的視角:光明與黑暗之間

聖經從不逃避死亡與黑暗的真相,但從來不將其浪漫化。死亡是罪的結果,是人與神關係斷裂的後果(創3:19;羅5:12)。同時,聖經也以極大的盼望回應死亡的陰影:「光照在黑暗裡,黑暗卻不勝過光。」(約1:5)

耶穌的復活不是宗教的象徵,而是對死亡的反擊,是黑暗中真實可依靠的亮光³。使徒保羅寫道:「你們從前是暗昧的,但如今在主裡面是光明的,行事為人就當像光明的子女。」(弗5:8)

因此,基督徒不是因文化懼怕萬聖節,而是因福音看穿它。


五、基督徒如何轉化萬聖節?

萬聖節為我們提供了一個靈性辨識的機會,提醒我們思考:我們是否對死亡有從信仰而來的認識?我們的家庭是習慣用娛樂遮蓋恐懼,還是選擇用信仰面對真相?

正如神學家 H. Richard Niebuhr 在《基督與文化》中所指出的⁴,信徒面對文化既不是完全拒絕、也不是全盤接受,而是尋求「在基督裡的轉化」——將文化指向那位真正的光。

我們可以選擇一種不同的節奏,在黑暗籠罩的時節,更深活出光明子女的生命。

具體實踐的第三條路


除了內在的反思,我們也可以透過具體行動來轉化這個節日:

•            舉辦「光明派對」:邀請孩子們穿上聖經人物或光明主題的服裝,而非恐怖造型。將慶祝重點放在豐收與歡樂,而不是恐懼。

•            傳遞福音信息:在發放糖果時,可以附上一張簡單的福音小卡片或印有聖經經文的貼紙,讓鄰里在歡慶中也能接觸到生命的真理。

•            教育孩子真理:利用這個機會與孩子們討論死亡、復活和耶穌戰勝死亡的真理,幫助他們理解光與黑暗的區別。

這世界沒有比復活的盼望更強大的亮光了。願我們在萬聖節的夜晚,不僅成為光的見證,更成為光本身的傳遞者。

 

Antony傳道

參考資料:

  1. Ronald Hutton, The Stations of the Sun: A History of the Ritual Year in Britain (Oxford University Press, 1996).
  2. Nicholas Rogers, Halloween: From Pagan Ritual to Party Night (Oxford University Press, 2002).
  3. Peter Kreeft & Ronald K. Tacelli, Handbook of Christian Apologetics (InterVarsity Press, 1994).
  4. H. Richard Niebuhr, Christ and Culture (Harper & Row, 1951).
  5. Craig G. Bartholomew & Michael W. Goheen, The Drama of Scripture: Finding Our Place in the Biblical Story (Baker Academic, 2004).

2025年7月2日星期三

《異象不是口號,計劃不是策略──釐清異象與年度計劃的關係》

 每逢年終年初,許多教會都會為來年訂立年度主題或計劃,例如「委身之年」、「同心事奉」、「復興之路」、「燃亮城市」等等。有時這些主題還會搭配口號標語、設計海報、安排講道系列與課程。這些安排本意良善,盼望凝聚方向、鼓勵參與,然而卻有領袖坦言:「我覺得這些年年更換的主題好像很空泛,不太清楚到底想做什麼。」

這樣的感受值得正視,但問題的根源,不在於「每年訂主題」這件事本身是否恰當,而在於我們是否混淆了「異象」與「年度計劃」在整體教會策略中的角色與層次。




一、異象不是口號,而是一種長遠的看見

「異象」(Vision)並非一年一變的目標或任務,而是對教會未來圖像的屬靈領受,是一幅來自上帝的圖畫,呼召我們一起走進。

它可以是:

  • 一個從神而來、放在領袖心中的夢想;
  • 一幅描繪未來群體榮美樣式的圖畫;
  • 一份渴望見證文化更新的願景;
  • 一個多年來深藏心中的屬靈呼聲。

因此,異象應具備以下特質:

  • 長遠而清晰:不是短期成果,而是對未來的召喚(如:「成為城市中的光」、「建立多代共融的門徒群體」);
  • 激發渴望與行動:不是單向告知「該做什麼」,而是讓人「想參與其中」;
  • 歷久常新、不隨潮流更動:異象是一份呼召,不是一句口號。

如果異象被簡化為「今年主題」或「每年都換的口號」,信徒就難以深入參與,久而久之也會覺得空洞,甚至覺得與自己無關。


二、年度計劃是異象的落實,不是凌駕取代異象

如果異象是我們要前往的目的地,那麼年度計劃就是我們當年要走多少里路、翻越哪些山丘、專注在哪些範疇。


年度主題與計劃的目的,是為了讓教會在邁向異象的旅程中,按部就班地實踐策略、檢視進度、修正方向。它必須與異象對齊,是異象的具體化表達,而不應該成為另起爐灶、方向模糊的獨立項目。


三、問題不在主題空泛,而在缺乏整合與承接

有領袖會說:「每年主題都換,沒一個記得住。」其實問題並不在於主題名稱是否吸引,而是每年主題與行動:

  • 缺乏與過去一年的承接與連貫;
  • 沒有與整體異象對齊,難以看出進程與邏輯;
  • 沒有釋放信徒的參與空間,只像行政安排的重新包裝。

這樣的設計,容易讓信徒覺得事不關己,視年度主題為形式,無法投入其中,也無法與教會的長遠方向接軌。


四、異象與計劃的健康關係應是這樣的:

  • 異象:固定不變,是教會未來的圖像(如:5年、10年藍圖)
  • 價值觀:塑造文化與方向,是異象的土壤與基調
  • 策略方向:異象實踐的路徑,可涵蓋門徒培育、關係建立、福音行動、事奉參與等面向
  • 年度計劃:根據當前現況,擇定最迫切與合適的焦點領域,作出推進與聚焦

異象就像是整體圖像,年度計劃就是逐年拼上的拼圖;異象是耕作方向,年度計劃則是當年該播什麼種子、施什麼肥料。


五、結語:異象需要持守,計劃需要整合

異象與年度計劃不是兩個彼此競爭的選項,而是一體兩面:前者是呼召,後者是回應。

關鍵從來不是「換不換主題」,而是:

  • 我們是否真的看見神給我們教會的異象?
  • 我們是否讓每一年的計劃,對準並承接異象的方向?
  • 我們是否讓信徒不只是聽到一句主題標語,而是願意與教會一起同行在這條屬靈旅程上?

當異象被持守、計劃被整合,信徒就不會只聽到一個口號,而是能看見整體圖像、體會其中的心意,並與教會一同走進神為我們預備的旅程。

Antony傳道

2025年5月8日星期四

Only Talking About Procedures, But Not Inner Life? — Rebuilding a Culture of Honesty in the Church Is a Calling We Can No Longer Avoid

🔹 Introduction|We’ve talked a lot about ministry processes, but rarely pause to ask: Is our heart still at rest?

Many churches are becoming increasingly mature in terms of structure—clear agendas, robust systems, numerous ministries. Each evaluation and refinement aims at improving efficiency and division of labor. Yet we rarely ask the more fundamental question: “Do we still have space in our inner lives to encounter God honestly?”


Once, we dared to point out procedural flaws, but now we avoid touching the spiritual dryness and struggles of our brothers and sisters. (What we see is often a congregation with expressionless faces.) Over time, the church becomes a place where systems function well, but souls remain unattended. This is not merely a strategic issue—it is a cultural illness. This article attempts to show: True renewal is not about adjusting structures or replacing strategies, but about rebuilding a culture of life that dares to be honest and present.

I. Top-Level Claim: When Church Culture Ignores Inner Life, Systems Conceal Truth and Callings Cannot Be Passed Down

Why is this the most critical crisis?

Because true transformation is not about how much the church does, but whether believers are being shaped by the Lord from the heart. If church culture encourages discussion only about processes and structures, but does not allow believers to face themselves honestly, then discipleship degenerates into administrative training, and the life of faith becomes a spiritual performance.

II. Argument One: Under a Procedure-Oriented Culture, Three Major Symptoms of Neglecting Inner Life

1️⃣ We notice external service, but ignore inner exhaustion

Peter Scazzero observes: “Many church leaders serve for years yet remain emotionally immature. They use ministry achievements to fill inner emptiness, creating a serious disconnect between their spiritual and emotional lives.”

[Scazzero, The Emotionally Healthy Church, p.37]

This is especially evident in mid-to-large-sized churches—when ministry structures grow more complex, but the leader’s inner renewal doesn’t keep pace, a contradiction arises: external growth outweighs inner breathing. As a result, many servants burn out, yet find no safe place to say, “I’m tired.”

2️⃣ We emphasize outward performance, but neglect identity

The Cure reminds us: “People in churches rarely dare admit, ‘I’m struggling,’ because they believe that once their weakness is seen, they will lose acceptance.”

[Lynch et al., The Cure, p.18]

Such a culture of “performance without substance” drives people to deny struggles and doubts to maintain a spiritual image. Believers gradually fill the void with activities and service, but drift further from the One who deeply loves them.

3️⃣ We speak of serving principles, but not of sincere relationship with God

Bonhoeffer writes: “Real fellowship is not working together but standing honestly before one another in Christ.”

[Bonhoeffer, Life Together, p.23]

When small groups are reduced to Bible studies and discussions without soul-sharing or mutual intercession; when elder board meetings discuss only strategy but not life—the church ceases to be God’s family and becomes a religious institution. We must ask again: “Do we still believe that God cares more about our hearts than our performance?”

III. Argument Two: Ignoring Inner Life Undermines Calling and Intergenerational Legacy

🪶 The Moment the Cloak Falls: Calling Is No Longer Seen

2 Kings 2 describes Elijah being taken up and his cloak falling. Elisha picks it up, symbolizing his willingness to carry the calling and walk a difficult path (2 Kings 2:13).

But today’s church leaders and believers hesitate before the fallen cloak. Why? Because in a culture that avoids struggles and cannot admit inadequacy, few feel secure enough to bear a calling. The cloak hasn’t disappeared—it’s that no one dares to pick it up.

👥 Legacy Is Built on Relationships, Not Arrangements

Legacy is never a prearranged handover ceremony—it is a transfer of trust within relationships. Elisha refuses to leave Elijah three times, persisting to walk with him. This was a spiritual bond, a kind of response: “As you live out your faith before me, I will follow likewise.”

Does your church still have this kind of culture? Or are we letting systems decide, instead of letting lives shape lives?

🌏 A Local Church’s Calling Cannot Be Replicated

We often imitate successful churches’ strategies and structures. But A Church Called Tov reminds us: “A healthy church is not built on suppression and control but on release and trust.”

[McKnight & Barringer, A Church Called Tov, p.59]

We are not Church X or Church Y. We are ourselves—the body God placed in this city. The church’s calling is not to copy others’ success but to respond to the identity God tailor-made for us.

IV. Argument Three: For Cultural Renewal, Leaders Must Model Honesty and Vulnerability

🔑 Leaders Must Demonstrate: Vulnerability Is Not Weakness, but the Starting Point of Sincerity

David Powlison writes: “True spiritual leadership is helping others experience being loved in truth.”

[Powlison, Speaking Truth in Love, p.41]

As pastors and leaders, when we admit our doubts, weaknesses, even distractions, we tell the community: “It’s safe to be real here.” A public confession often opens hearts more effectively than ten sermons.

🧭 From Doing to Being: The Foundation of Spiritual Maturity

Chapter 6 of The Emotionally Healthy Church emphasizes: If we focus only on doing without being, the church will eventually burn out. Renewal is not about more ministry—it’s about deeper presence.

[Scazzero, p.117]

A culture of being helps people understand: I am not loved because I do well—I am willing to respond because I am already loved by God.

V. Practical Steps: Three Strategies to Rebuild a Culture of Honesty

✅ 1. Integrate “Real-Life Sharing” into Gatherings

The church should create “non-performance spaces” where people can honestly say, “I feel far from God lately” or “I’m spiritually weary.” This is not an excuse for laziness—it’s the starting point of spiritual renewal.

✅ 2. Leaders to Model “Inner Witness”

In sermons or meetings, leaders can appropriately share snippets of their own spiritual journey—how God called them back in times of loss or anxiety. Such sharing shows the church is not a performance stage, but a place of spiritual healing. (More personal testimony is encouraged.)

✅ 3. Train Small Group Leaders in “Soul Conversations”

Referencing Crucial Conversations on safe space and motive clarification, group leaders should be trained in guided listening and emotional engagement.

[Patterson et al., Crucial Conversations, p.65]

A small group is not just for Bible study or meals—it should be a discipleship arena where believers support one another and understand each other’s inner lives.

VI. Conclusion|Who Will Pick Up the Cloak of Calling?

Today, the Lord is calling those willing to rebuild a culture of honesty and inner life in the church. He is not asking, “What have you planned?” but rather, “Is your heart still willing to respond to Me?”

Calling is not the transfer of skills, but the passing on of spirit. True cultural transformation does not begin with documents or meetings—it begins when a life is touched, and someone dares to pick up the cloak.

Will you be the first?

Not because you are fully prepared,

But because you are willing to honestly influence others with your life.

— Pastor Antony


📚 References

  • Scazzero, Peter. The Emotionally Healthy Church. Zondervan, 2010, pp. 37, 117.

  • Lynch, John et al. The Cure. Trueface, 2011, p.18.

  • Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Life Together. HarperOne, 1954, p.23.

  • McKnight, Scot & Barringer, Laura. A Church Called Tov. Tyndale, 2020, p.59.

  • Powlison, David. Speaking Truth in Love. New Growth Press, 2005, p.41.

  • Patterson, Kerry et al. Crucial Conversations, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill, 2012, p.65.

2025年5月7日星期三

只敢講程序,卻不敢談內在生命?──重建教會的誠實文化,是我們無法再逃避的召命

🔹前言|我們談了很多事工流程,卻很少停下來問:我們的心還安在嗎?

許多教會在程序上日漸成熟——議程明確、架構完整、事工繁多。每一次的檢討與優化都針對效率與分工,但我們卻很少問一個更根本的問題:「我們的內在生命,還有空間與神誠實相遇嗎?」

曾幾何時,我們敢於指出流程的瑕疵,卻迴避觸及弟兄姊妹心靈的枯乾與掙扎。(表現出來就是弟兄姐妹普遍木無表情)久而久之,教會成了一個「制度運作良好、心靈卻無人照料」的群體。這不是策略問題,而是文化病灶。本文嘗試指出:真正的更新,不在於改制度或換策略,而在於是否重建一個「敢於誠實相對」的生命文化。


一、頂層主張:教會文化若忽略內在生命,制度將遮蔽真理,召命亦難以傳承

為何這是最根本的危機?

因為真正的轉化,不在於教會做了多少事,而在於信徒是否從心靈被主塑造。若教會的文化只鼓勵討論流程與制度,卻不容許信徒誠實面對自己,門徒訓練將淪為事務訓練,信仰生活將流於屬靈表演。

二、第一論點:程序導向之下,內在生命被忽略的三大文化病象

1️⃣ 我們看見外在事奉,卻忽略內心枯竭

Peter Scazzero 指出:「許多教會領袖事奉多年,卻情感未成熟,他們以事工成就填補內心空虛,導致屬靈與情感嚴重脫節。」【註1:Scazzero, The Emotionally Healthy Church, p.37】

這現象在華人教會尤為明顯——當事工結構日漸複雜,領袖的內在更新卻未同步發展,便會出現「外在成長壓倒靈裡生命」的矛盾。結果,許多服侍者燃燒殆盡,卻找不到可以說「我累了」的空間。

2️⃣ 我們看重行動表現,卻忽略身份認同

《The Cure》提醒我們:「教會中的人很少敢承認『我有掙扎』,因為他們認為一旦被看見軟弱,就會失去接納。」【註2:Lynch et al., The Cure, p.18】

這種「只有表現,沒有實存」的信仰文化,令人為了保持屬靈形象而否認掙扎與懷疑。信徒漸漸習慣以活動、事奉來填補空洞,卻遠離那位如此愛他的主。

3️⃣ 我們講服侍的準則,卻不談與神的真誠關係

Bonhoeffer 指出:「真正的團契,不是一起工作,而是彼此在基督裡誠實相對。」【註3:Bonhoeffer, Life Together, p.23】

當小組只剩查經與討論,沒有靈命分享與相互代禱;當長執會只談策略不談生命,教會便不再是主的家,而只是宗教組織。我們需要重新問:「我們是否仍相信,神關心我們的內心多於我們的表現?」

三、第二論點:忽略內在生命,將削弱召命承擔與代際傳承

🪶 外衣落地的時刻:召命不再被看見

《列王紀下》2章描述以利亞升天、外衣落地的場景。以利沙主動撿起外衣,象徵他願意承擔召命,走上一條不易的道路(王下2:13)。

但今日的教會領袖與信徒,面對這件外衣時卻猶疑不決。為何?因為在一個不能談掙扎、不敢承認不配的文化中,很少人有安全感去承擔召命。外衣不是沒落下,而是沒人敢撿。

👥 傳承的本質是關係,而非安排

傳承從來不是一場安排好的交接儀式,而是關係中的信任傳遞。以利沙三次拒絕離開,三次堅持與以利亞同行,那是一種靈裡的連結,也是一種「你在我前面怎樣活出信仰,我就願意怎樣跟隨」的回應。

你我所在的教會是否仍有這種文化?還是,我們只是讓制度做決定,而非讓生命影響生命?

🌏 地方教會的召命不可複製

我們常模仿成功教會的策略與架構,但《A Church Called Tov》提醒:「健康的教會,不是建立在壓抑與掌控,而是建立在釋放與信任之上。」【註4:McKnight & Barringer, A Church Called Tov, p.59】

我們不是 XXX,也不是XX,我們是我們自己,是神放在這個城中的身體。教會的召命不是效法別人的成功,而是回應神為我們量身而設的身份。

四、第三論點:文化要轉化,領袖需帶頭活出誠實與脆弱

🔑 領袖要示範:脆弱不是弱點,而是真誠的起點

David Powlison 認為:「真正的屬靈引導,是讓人在真理中經歷被愛。」【註5:Powlison, Speaking Truth in Love, p.41】

作為牧者或領袖,我們若願意承認自己曾經懷疑、軟弱、甚至失焦,整個群體便會明白:「原來這裡可以真誠」。一場公開的認罪,往往比十場講道更能打開心靈。

🧭 從Doing轉向Being,是屬靈成熟的根基

《The Emotionally Healthy Church》第六章強調:若只重視「doing」而無「being」,教會最終會枯竭。真正的更新,從不是更多事工,而是更深實存。【註6:Scazzero, p.117】

Being 的文化,讓人明白:我不是因為做得好才被神愛,而是因為被神愛,才願意起來回應呼召。

五、實踐行動:重建誠實文化的三個策略

✅ 1. 在聚會中加入「真實現況分享」

教會應設立一個「真實現況分享」的空間,讓人可以真實說出「我最近感到神很遠」、「我在靈裡很疲乏」。這不是懶散的藉口,而是靈命復興的起點。

✅ 2. 領袖主動示範「內在見證」

主日講道或會議分享中,適度加入自身靈程的誠實片段,分享神如何在自己的失落、焦慮中再次呼喚。這樣的分享會讓群體相信:「教會不是屬靈表演場地,而是屬靈療癒之所。」(多分享個人見證)

✅ 3. 訓練小組長進行「靈命對話」

參考《Crucial Conversations》中對安全空間與動機澄清的教導,小組長應接受引導性聆聽與情緒回應的訓練。【註7:Patterson et al., Crucial Conversations, p.65】

小組的任務,不只是查經與聚餐,更是建立信徒彼此扶持、認識內在狀況的門訓之地。

六、結語|誰來撿起那件召命的外衣?

今日主正在呼喚那群願意為教會重建「誠實與內在生命」文化的人。他不是問我們「你計劃了甚麼?」,而是問我們:「你的心,還願意回應我嗎?」

召命不是技巧的承接,而是心靈的傳遞。真正的文化轉化,不會從文件或會議開始,而是從有人生命被影響,勇敢撿起那件外衣開始。

你願否成為那第一位? 不是因為你準備好了,而是因為你願意真誠地以生命影響別人了。

Antony傳道


📚 參考書目與註腳:

  1. Scazzero, Peter. The Emotionally Healthy Church. Zondervan, 2010, p.37, 117.

  2. Lynch, John et al. The Cure. Trueface, 2011, p.18.

  3. Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Life Together. HarperOne, 1954, p.23.

  4. McKnight, Scot & Barringer, Laura. A Church Called Tov. Tyndale, 2020, p.59.

  5. Powlison, David. Speaking Truth in Love. New Growth Press, 2005, p.41.

  6. Scazzero, Peter. The Emotionally Healthy Church, p.117.

  7. Patterson, Kerry et al. Crucial Conversations, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill, 2012, p.65.

2025年4月19日星期六

《復活節的靈修旅程——從聖灰日至復活主日》The Spiritual Journey of Easter — From Ash Wednesday to Resurrection Sunday

 

引言:在時間中與基督同行
Introduction: Walking with Christ through Time

復活節不是只為記念耶穌的事,而是邀請我們走進祂的生命旅程中。

Easter is not only about remembering Jesus, but about entering into the rhythm of His life.

Robert Webber 提醒我們:「基督教的時間,是以基督的死與復活為中心的時間。」

Robert Webber reminds us: “Christian time is centered on the death and resurrection of Christ.”

一、節期總覽:悔改 → 默想 → 復活

1. Liturgical Overview: Repentance → Meditation → Resurrection

節期

時間

屬靈意義

Season

Timeframe

Spiritual Meaning

聖灰日

復活節前46天

開始悔改、記得人是塵土

Ash Wednesday

46 days before Easter

Beginning of repentance, remembering our mortality

四旬期

聖灰日至主的晚餐日(主日除外)

禁食、祈禱、操練更新

Lent

Ash Wednesday to Maundy Thursday (excluding Sundays)

Fasting, prayer, and inner renewal

聖週

棕枝主日至聖週六

進入主的苦難與順服

Holy Week

Palm Sunday to Holy Saturday

Entering into Christ’s suffering and obedience

復活主日

春分後首個滿月後的主日

慶祝主得勝死亡與罪惡

Easter Sunday

Sunday after the first full moon after the spring equinox

Celebrating victory over sin and death


Joan Chittister 寫道:「不是我們走進節期,而是節期進入我們,形塑我們。」

Joan Chittister writes: “We don’t enter the liturgical year; it enters us and shapes us.”

二、猶太節期與復活節的轉化
2. From Jewish Feasts to Christian Fulfillment

猶太節期

基督節期

神學意義

Jewish Feast

Christian Fulfillment

Theological Meaning

逾越節

主的晚餐日(聖週四)

耶穌是逾越羔羊,設立新約聖餐(林前5:7)

Passover

Maundy Thursday

Jesus is the Passover Lamb (1 Cor. 5:7)

無酵節

耶穌埋葬期間

無罪之主為人死去,潔淨與盼望

Feast of Unleavened Bread

Holy Saturday

Sinless Savior buried; hope and purification

初熟節

復活節

基督是初熟果子(林前15:20),預示新生命

Feast of Firstfruits

Easter Sunday

Christ is the firstfruits, the beginning of new life


Webber 說:「如同逾越節不是講故事,而是活出被拯救的生命;復活節也是讓我們活出『復活中的生活』。」

Webber says: “Just as Passover is not just telling a story but living the redeemed life, Easter invites us to live resurrection life.”

三、三位神學家的屬靈呼喚
3. Three Theological Voices on Resurrection Spirituality

✦ Joan Chittister(靈修層次)

「聖週是一場靈魂的冒險,讓我們進入受難,也進入真正的盼望。」
“Holy Week is a spiritual adventure that leads us into suffering—and into hope.”

✦ Robert Webber(教會年曆與生活整合)

「教會年曆不是活動安排,而是讓我們活出洗禮的節奏——與基督一同死,一同活。」
“The Christian year is not a calendar of events but a baptismal rhythm—dying and rising with Christ.”

✦ N. T. Wright(神國盼望)

「復活節不是天上事,是神的國度進入世界的行動。『復活』是現在的使命,不是將來的逃避。」
“Easter isn’t about going to heaven; it’s about God’s kingdom coming to earth. Resurrection is mission now, not escape later.”

四、結語:讓復活住在我們裡面
4. Conclusion: Let Resurrection Take Root Within

我們不是在「過一個節」,而是在節期中「被更新」。我們不是記念過去,而是活出今天的改變。

We’re not merely observing a season—we are being transformed by it. Not just remembering the past, but living today in its power.

正如 N. T. Wright 所言:「復活節是希望本人(Hope in Person)從未來走入現在。」

As N. T. Wright put it: “Easter is when Hope in Person surprised the world by coming from the future into the present.” 

參考書目(References):

Chittister, Joan. 2009. The Liturgical Year: The Spiraling Adventure of the Spiritual Life. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
Webber, Robert E. 2004. Ancient-Future Time: Forming Spirituality through the Christian Year. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books.
Wright, N. T. 2008. Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church. New York: HarperOne.